The party, which is acting as the popular accuser in the case, maintains that the documentation sent only includes a portion of the communications requested. As reported by SER, the judge had asked the Alicante City Council for emails sent by the municipal Heritage department to the General Vice-Secretariat between January 15th and 31st, along with their attachments. However, according to the PSPV's complaint, the documentation submitted to the case only contains emails sent between January 26th and 31st.
These communications are relevant to the investigation because, according to the accusers, they allegedly alerted to potential incompatibilities or conflicts of interest related to some of the protected housing awardees. The case focuses on the alleged irregularities detected in the adjudication process for the VPP in Les Naus, a development built on municipal land.
The socialist group has requested the magistrate to once again demand the full set of emails from the City Council. In the opinion of the popular accuser, the court needs all communications from the requested period to clarify whether internal warnings about potential conflicts were issued before the file was closed. This request comes after the judge had already sought these emails as part of the proceedings opened regarding the development's adjudications.
According to reports, the investigating judge had previously requested additional documentation from the City Council and had even ordered the police to visit municipal offices to gather information related to the case. The PSPV believes that the partial submission of emails hinders full access to documentation that could be crucial. The popular accuser insists that all requested communications must be included, not just those from the final days of the period set by the magistrate.
For its part, the PP governing team has so far defended that the Alicante City Council is cooperating with the Justice system to clarify the potential irregularities under investigation. The municipal government has also attributed some of the procedural issues to judicial notifications that were allegedly sent to an inoperative email account. The investigation into Les Naus remains focused on the adjudication process of these protected homes and the possible existence of beneficiaries who did not meet the required criteria.




